The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind, but it could be more usefully applied. How far do you agree?
It is said that pouring money into space researches is beneficial to humanity, however, it should be used for other fields such as education, poverty, or healthcare. From my point of view, I completely agree with this statement.
On the one hand, it cannot be denied that space exploration is bringing clear profits to mankind. The foremost reason is that it paves the way for advanced technology. For instance, the old generation used to predict the weather based on the experience they had collected for years, however, in this modern world, with space experiments, weather, even natural disasters, is predicted by data from satellite technology. Another advantage that can be listed is that this aspect helps people enhance their knowledge about outer space. By exploring space, individuals can get answers to fundamental questions about extra-terrestrial beings, habitable lands, and celestial planets.
However, governments should spend more on social issues like poverty, schooling, environmental pollution, or healthcare as they are having negative effects on the multitudes. In poor countries, especially in Africa, individuals are putting up with poverty, homelessness, and lack of education, sometimes die because of hunger. Therefore, the administration should pour more money into providing their citizens who need shelters as well as financial support. Moreover, financial assistance for space experiments is likely to put pressure on the government budget hence, that should be transferred to medical research as it is more practical. It may find new treatments for illnesses including HIV/AIDS, Covid-19, or cancer.
In conclusion, carrying out space exploration is beneficial for mankind but spending on social problems is also required.
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five year in American dollars for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year as the projects are set 72
- Women are better at childcare than men therefore they should focus more on raising children and less on their working life To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The inequality between rich and poor nations is now wider than it has ever been before What do you think are the main causes of this difference and what do you think can be done to reduce the gap 89
- The graph below shows how elderly people in Europe spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table shows the average length of video advertisements on the Internet and the average length of time viewers spend watching them Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6553030303 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09408027682 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651515151515 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.356245683 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.846153846 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166501483867 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572349665661 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485326595071 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104509224888 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318424519184 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.