the bar chart below shows the results of a poll of theater-goers on what disturbs them during performances at the theatre.
The chart gives information about the irritant based on theater-goers during their watching experience.
Looking from an overall perspective, most of those people were disturbed by the rustling sweet papers, those remaining factors accounted for more than 25% of each one.
As the chart portrays, rustling sweet paper was the primary reason that bothered a hefty 92% of cinema-goes, followed by approximately 78% of coughing, which was 2-3% higher than arriving late. On the other hand, 65% of theater-goes cited that they were irritated by the whisper, while more than 50% were from mobile phones. It is also shown that half of surveyed complain about sneezing.
As for disturbances related to bleeps and armrest hogging contributed to 42% and 25%, respectively. There was a similarity in the statistics of flash photography and big hairdos when they both concluded 30% of the sampled. In addition, the proportion of tall people was witnessed to be equal to that of snoring at 35%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-10 | beauty flowers | 55 | view |
| 2018-09-20 | mahsa1989 | 67 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometers traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 78
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home housework and gardening 84
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home housework and gardening 78
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, so, while, as for, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1625 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88693176227 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69375 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0960356046 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103305327099 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043140338188 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529179759773 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717300635703 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061264248672 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, so, while, as for, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1625 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88693176227 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69375 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0960356046 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103305327099 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043140338188 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529179759773 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717300635703 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061264248672 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.