The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
The given bar chart compares the percentage of population of five cities, which are surveyed about their coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in last 4 weeks in Australia.
Overall, it is evident that almost more than half of city residents among Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, Holbart preferred to go to a cafe for coffee or tea rather than buy them and less than 45% people in 5 cities bought fresh coffee with the trade of fresh coffee having the least proportion among other options.
As is observed from the chart, in Sydney, Melbourne, Holbart we can see that they have nearly the same percent over than 60% on going to a cafe for coffee or tea in last 4 weeks. But Brisbane and Adelaide have less percentage than the other 3 cities, respectively just over 55% and just under 50%.
As for the second option, buying fresh coffee in last 4 weeks, Brisbane and Adelaide have the same proportion accounting for slightly under 35%, whereas this option makes up well over 40% and well under 40% in Sydney, Melbourne, Holbart, respectively.
When it comes to buying instant coffee in last 4 weeks, over half of surveyed residents of Brisbane and Holbart preferred the third option, although in the other 3 cities, this percentage is between 50% and 45%.
- The line graphs below show the production and demand for steel in million tones in the steel industry in the UK in 2010 61
- It is thought by some that its is better to live in a city while others believe that life is better in the countryside Discuss both sides and give your opinion 67
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Australia
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 82
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Australia
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...e nearly the same percent over than 60% on going to a cafe for coffee or tea in last 4 w...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, third, well, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80909090909 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45200204926 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527272727273 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.3782226809 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.333333333 112.824112599 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.6666666667 22.9334400587 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218362484066 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121644559906 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115214979093 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140809275745 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114426096223 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.2329268293 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.