Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In recent days, due to the extraordinary development in technology, the educational methods experience some innovation typically studying online. According to this writer’s perspective, studying online might bring some consequences because of three key factors: lack of physical interaction, toxic temptations and eliminating the original definition of offline education.
Learning from home or learning online lead to the problem of lack of physical interaction among teachers, students and friends. As long as humans associate education, man has to attend a class physically because in that way teachers or professors are capable of observing their emotions to figure out whether they understand the lectures or not. Without observing the students, teachers might experience difficulties in managing the whole class. Therefore, studying at home should not be required.
Discussing other elements, the students or the learner might be distracted by the toxic temptations. Studying online is the method by which learners get access to the school website or the apps. Contemporarily, they can also get access to other platforms such as games and social media. In that way, the learners might be attracted by the distractions. Eventually, they experienced various educational disabilities and restrictions.
The last factor is also the most serious problem because spreadly associating online courses might eliminate the original form of classroom. As most people know, classrooms are places which produce spaces for the teachers, the students and other employees at school to physically communicate. When all educational activities are transferred to online, the students can not afford enough interactions with others. If there is an upsurge of online classrooms, the later generations will not approach the most efficient learning method and the offline classroom might be forgotten.
In conclusion, development in the field of learning online is a threat because of its three factors which are lack of physical interaction, toxic temptations and eliminating the original definition of offline education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | Nguyen144202 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | oanh2020 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | maidiem.1508 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | thanhbinh | 61 | view |
- Task 2 Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 11
- In some cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what action can be taken to solve the problem 56
- Memorising facts is the most important way to succeed in education To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The charts below show the types of work occupied by people from Province A and Province B in England 84
- Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crimes To what extent do you agree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the educational methods experience some innovation typically studying online. Ac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77564102564 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14677652501 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9527722952 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0876943592023 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306685583259 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357842352747 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0517187292898 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310942558382 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.