More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses. Why? Who benefits more from this, the community or these young people?
Recent years have witnessed a phenomenal growth in youngsters’ participating in voluntary work in developing countries. There are some reasons accounting for this phenomenon, and I am convinced that it would bring certain benefits to the host community as well as the volunteers.
With regard to the reasons, overseas volunteering could be firstly attributable to the young’s eagerness to broaden their knowledge about different parts of the world. For example, they could have a chance to do voluntary work in African nations, where indigenous people are suffering from the insufficiency of accommodations and sanitary conditions. Through these campaigns, the young volunteers would not only have a different perspective of the economic situation of certain regions, but acquire invaluable experience by giving aid and sharing hardships with the community as well. Secondly, volunteering is an occasion for young people to enhance soft skills such as communicating and cooperating, which probably would be advantageous in the future. For instance, the skills and volunteering experience could perhaps be merits when adding to CVs for youngsters, for this is a way to prove their enthusiasm and knowledge to the targeted company.
In light of the voluntary campaigns, I would argue that either the recipient nations or the volunteers would benefit. For the host communities, the provision of basic necessities and accommodations could somehow contribute to better living qualities. Besides, the children in these communities could get access to education via activities which teach them literacy and numeracy. When it comes to the benefits of the volunteers, by devoting time and effort to helping the communities, they would learn to appreciate the labor value, and also expand their social circle by cooperating with colleagues from different cultures. Moreover, the volunteering work would contribute to the young’s more mature perspective about life.
In conclusion, the young’s reasons for engaging in volunteering work abroad could be explained by the need to gain knowledge and valuable experience. I believe that these voluntary campaigns are beneficial to both the community receiving and the volunteers who devote their effort to helping people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-21 | phanhhh | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | vivitoben | 82 | view |
| 2021-06-29 | vothihuongdungvn | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-29 | vothihuongdungvn | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Dongvo | 87 | view |
- The two maps below show the changes in town of Denham from 1986 to the present day Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994 according to United Nation statistics 84
- Most people do not care enough about environmental issues To what extent to do agree or disagree with this statement 88
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts give information about the volunteers by organization in 2008 and 2018 Summarizing the report by describing the main features with comparing data 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... the host communities, the provision of basic necessities and accommodations could somehow contri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63450292398 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16009372214 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540935672515 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.614476659 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.642857143 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185915281061 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650147436116 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041639880571 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110184369127 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237893538528 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.