You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
It is believed by some people that organising a global sports event would be beneficial for the nation, whereas, others think that it could be bad. In my opinion, while there are some valid arguments to the contrary, the idea of hosting the sports event should be prioritised.
On the one hand, several adverse effects could be accrued if the international sports event takes place. Significantly, infrastructure which was built for the event could not be used on purpose permanently. This is because the sporting demand in the country could not meet with the great deal of facilities such as stadiums, pools,... For example, at the Olympic 1988, South Korea built a huge special olympic village just to serve the event but now it is used for operating a park.
On the other hand, personally, hosting a global event would be a better option due to many advantages. Firstly, global recognition would be given to the country. This could be explained that organizing a major event proved that the country has enough sources of funds and facilities to meet the fixed demand. For instance, a Sea Game Operator would give an international certificate to the host country in terms of responsibilities and abilities. Secondly, thanks to this kind of event, the host nation could earn a considerable revenue. This comes from the activities of selling tickets or copyrights and improving domestic tourism. According to the
National Administration of Brazil's Tourism, due to Olympic Rio 2016, 35% higher in tourists have come to Brazil for observing the matches.
In conclusion, although some impact could be found by hosting an international sports event, this action would be a logical investment for each country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-17 | Duong12345 | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-25 | Urvashi Singh | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-27 | zarutopath | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-23 | sonicmaster | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | hieupham01 | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...by some people that organising a global sports event would be beneficial for the natio...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...o the contrary, the idea of hosting the sports event should be prioritised. On the ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...s could be accrued if the international sports event takes place. Significantly, infra...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...al of facilities such as stadiums, pools,... For example, at the Olympic 1988, Sou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11743772242 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89801228372 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572953736655 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4149285282 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.714285714 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220187427911 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822476106273 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638610903493 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133990434955 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806915540205 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.