sending human to Mars
The reading and the passage are both about the troubles regarding sending human to Mars. Actually, the author discusses three issues pertinent to humans' landing on Mars. On the other hand, the professor is not convinced of this and casts doubt on each issues presented in the reading. Point to the other side of the story, the speaker is of the opinion that although landing on Mars is challenging, however, there are some solutions.
To begin with, the author argues that since traveling to Mars lasts two years, it is virtually impossible to provide integral supplies for the crew for this prolonged mission. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. According to the professor, astronauts are able to use hydroponic, which is a technique utilized to grow plants in water requiring less space, in order to provide their essential material. Furthermore, the speaker asserts that by cultivating plants in small wet areas in the ship, the crew can use plants as food, recycle the water as drinking water, and breath the oxygen that plants yield.
Secondly, the writer disputes that humans are under zero-gravity environment on the Mars which causes medical problems. To delineate, muscle mass and bone density decrease under the situation of lacking gravity. Contrastly, the lecturer, opposes this notion by asserting that astronauts can use vitamins and mineral material including Calcium to compensate the problems that occur owing to the zero-gravity environment.
Finally, the author averts that humans are susceptible to hazardous solar radiation which adversely threat them in the absence of Earth's magnetic field on Mars. Moreover, it is stated in the passage that as building a shield for the ship increases ship's weight, its impossible to protect them by a shelter. In contrast, the professors stance is that solar radiation is not perilous all the time, but it is, now and then, dangerous when the sun is active. Therefore, the crew can use some equipment in order the determine the hazardous radiation and shelter in a small shield area in the ship at that time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-10 | Shahjahan khandakar | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | joeyrussell007 | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-14 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2023-01-08 | safasml | 70 | view |
- it is better to learn from those at your own level like students or people at higher level like teachers 70
- did Sinasauropteryx have feather or not Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made reading passage 73
- disadvantages of selling fossils to the private sellers 61
- the veracity of stories about Bredan s voyage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 324, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ect them by a shelter. In contrast, the professors stance is that solar radiation is not p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 507, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...he crew can use some equipment in order the determine the hazardous radiation and shelter in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 341.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12316715543 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6881947924 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5857974397 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.466666667 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06452816374 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170579696501 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536162697279 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790757747661 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100874740642 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821411500412 0.0443174109184 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 63.6247240618 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 324, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ect them by a shelter. In contrast, the professors stance is that solar radiation is not p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 507, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...he crew can use some equipment in order the determine the hazardous radiation and shelter in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 341.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12316715543 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6881947924 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5857974397 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.466666667 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06452816374 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170579696501 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536162697279 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790757747661 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100874740642 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821411500412 0.0443174109184 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 63.6247240618 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.