The chart below gives information about levels of education by age range in Glasgow in 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart compares the education levels by 5 various age brackets in Glasgow in 2010.
It is noticeable that the majority of persons having a university degree was in the younger age range while most of the people in the oldest age range have no certificate. The share of people in the 3 youngest groups obtaining no qualifications was the same.
Starting with the youngest age brackets, 76% of people hold university, slightly higher than the figures for individuals age 16-24 and 35-50, at 71. Meanwhile, the rate of persons who have school certificates was greater in 16-24 and 35-50 age groups than in 24-35, at 20% and 15% respectively. Moreover, the same percentages of persons with no qualifications (9 people) were recorded in all 3 age ranges.
Turning to the oldest demographics, the proportion of individuals obtaining university degrees in 50-to-75-year-old was 50%, double the figure for those aged 75 and over, at 25%. Similarly, 20% of people aged 50 to 75 had decided to complete only high school education, compared to a mere 3% of 75 and older age group. This trend was reversed in those with no certificate, 72% in those aged 75 and over and 30% in 50-75-year-old people
- Question 2 Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of population aged 65 and above in three countries 73
- The table below gives information about values NZ of the exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 73
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram shows how the horse evolved through time with particular emphasis on its foot structure 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89655172414 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06227278677 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0624390838 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.444444444 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101696844505 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061864225054 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797195133817 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108063216656 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978436058499 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.