The chart below shows changes in the number of international students in Australia in 2019 and 2020. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart shows how the figure for Australian foreign students from 6 various countries changed in a 2-year period.
It’s noticeable that the quantity of Chinese students studying in Australia was always the highest of the 6 nations. Also, while the number of international students from China, Brazil, and Malaysia showed a downward trend, the opposite was true for that of overseas students from India, Nepal, and Vietnam over the period shown.
In 2019, the number of Chinese students studying abroad in Australia was 182,325, compared with 92,024 of India and 46,382 of Nepal. In the year 2020, the figure for international students from India and Nepal rose slightly to 108,049 and 50,252 respectively, whereas the quantity of that in China showed a decrease by 14,757.
Turning to the other countries, initiating at 22,204 in 2019, there was a gentle increase to 23,268 in the quantity of Vietnamese students who study abroad in Australia over the following year. On the other hand, Brazil and Malaysia followed a similar pattern, starting at around 20,000 each before falling marginally to 21,086 and 19,564 respectively at the end of the period.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-10-02 | myduyen282 | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Essay 6 Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The table below shows the number of visitors in the UK and their average spending from 2003 to 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups who went to the cinema once a month in Great Britain Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of people in Africa subscribing to mobile and fixed line phones from 1994 to 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16402116402 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64094846098 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560846560847 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.8615722698 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.428571429 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179486880733 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895309121665 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415034231607 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117327287947 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411811776875 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.