It is important to improve our skills and knowledge as much as possible. Some people prefer to learn from individuals who have more experience than they do - like teachers and supervisors - instead of learning from peers, like their colleagues and classmates. Do you think this is a good idea? Why or why not?"
Nowadays, the world has placed a premium on knowledge and skills one can obtain from higher education. Although, a plenty of people advocate that it is of importance to acquire knowledge and skills by taking in an essential information from a versatile person such as educators, others hold the opposite perspective I profoundly would rather develop education and gain competence in a wide range of skills by the help of instructors.
The first reason I should mention is that receiving a well-rounded education should be delivered by the help of someone who is expert. Professors and teachers transferring information for years are likely to be far more informative compared to peers who has lately taken in something new. To be more specific, dealing with a various array of students and learners for years, has prepared tutors for a wind range of new questions. In addition, educators possess a collection of methods to respond to those questions. Not only does it help them to answer to those questions without any hesitation, but is also helps us to receive our answer faster. On the contrary, finding our answer, we are required and are obliged to spend too much time on asking our peers to find the answers, since they are obliged to search for the answers.
Another point I could add is that peers’ knowledge might not be adequate in a specialized subject. It is of importance that people find someone who is capable of answering a question in great details. To keep abreast of fast-changing and competitive society, educators dedicate their lives to be expert and adept in specific subject. For instance, a biologist is able to respond to questions about the origins of life, and a psychologist is able to cover questions related to humans’ lives. As a result, in order to be aware of our questions, we can refer to someone who is knowledgeable in a special subject.
All in all, I prefer to find the answers by the help of a tutor, for they are accomplished. Also, our peers might not have a decent knowledge related to our questions.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The knowledge we gain from personal experiences is more valuable than the experience we gain from books Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Do not use memorized examples 76
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over 73
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cellphone online games and social networking websites 73
- TPO 46 Integrated Writing Task 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 832, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are obliged to search for the answers. Another point I could add is that peers’...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... knowledgeable in a special subject. All in all, I prefer to find the answers...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86894586895 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89598582074 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532763532764 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4079680402 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.933333333 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179713638625 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586345167368 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440866179121 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112182301516 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233541413105 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.