It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.
What are advantages and disadvantages of this development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In this contemporary era, researchers and visitors are now able to travel to almost any of the remote places around the planet. The ability to travel to such places, in itself was a huge achievement for humankind. Whereas, it does possess some pros and cons to traveling to such untouched natural places.
Exploring the unknown is in human nature itself. Scientists, researchers, or explorers around the globe usually run an expedition, ranging from days to months. They try to explore the most remote places of the planet like the South Pole, Amazon's Forest, Pacific Ocean, and Antarctica etcetera, for numerous reasons. Scientists/researchers learn to survive in these unhabitable environments to execute their respective research/experiments like studying the hole of the Ozone layer or what lies beneath the antarctic snow etcetera. Their research in turn led humankind to use various natural gifts provided by the planet and knowledge. Whereas tourists visiting such places are usually experienced in exploring the planet, their trips to such unhabitable places also spread awareness among people, that, if stuck how to survive in such conditions.
However, every coin has its two sides, exploring such remote and untouched environments also has some disadvantages which can directly affect them. Exploration of such places by scientists will lead to knowledge of any natural resource if available to governments, eventually leading to the exploitation of that particular natural environment that should have remained untouched by humans. For instance, whenever some precious ore or oil fields located in remote places around the globe come on the radar of the governments, they try to exploit them all, seeking revenue. Tourists traveling to such places can also hamper the original/untouched conditions of such environments.
To sum up, the ability to explore the planet at its remotest places was a huge breakthrough but also brought some disadvantages with it. Scientists/tourists exploring the world can bring huge information/knowledge to humankind but they must not try to hamper or exploit those untouched environments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | lalo | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | TrangDuong | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-25 | pbson639 | 92 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | Kubraguran | 56 | view |
- The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given 67
- Wood pellets manufactured by this process are suitable for use in both pellet stoves and pellet furnaces Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any r 89
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Leisure time in a typical week in hour by sex and employment status 19 78
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, whereas, as to, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5504587156 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36363357182 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574923547401 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1600102249 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211871819202 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758853124903 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381508601773 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135133588451 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515006864247 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.