The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
» Write at least 150 words.
The comparison in four different online sales sectors in New Zealand throughout 11 years since 2003 is displayed by the bar charts, shown in percentage.
Overall, the main fact which is obviously observed is that the selling of books and entertainment media (music and film) were increasingly popular, while the buying of two counterparts experienced a decrease.
As per data, in the initial year, travel was the most profitable sector accounted for more than three-fifths of online purchase, followed by clothes and audio-and-visual one at 24% and 21% respectively. Meanwhile, the good being the least to be bought was the books mostly at one-fifth.
Furthermore, journey sector, a decade later, witnessed a gradual decline of its sales by 7%. As well as the former, the figure for clothing products also plummeted at less than two in ten. This contrasted with two those, the electronically selling rate of reading books significantly inclined at 22%, and the entertainment one stood out to be the maximum data recorded, at 33%.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the percentage of people accessing news via different media in one country in 2013 2015 and 2017 79
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 78
- The graphs shows figures relating to hours works and stress levels amongst professionals in eight groups 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, well, while, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18562874251 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12017995732 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688622754491 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7370170384 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.714285714 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162354001043 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720502061998 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502737489071 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956146989534 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594501631858 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.