In many countries, people like to eat a wide range of food that cannot be grown in their local place. Therefore, much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions.
Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantages?
Due to the economic advancement, demand for various foods for meals is noticeably seen in a number of households in the developing and developed countries. In fact, there is a tendency that people are in favour of nourishment that stems from other places rather than local ones. From the vantage point, I utterly believe that the pros of this trend outstripped the cons, which will be dissected with rationales in the essay below.
To commence, it is conspicuous that the trend offers both peasants and consumers several benefits. In terms of peasants, because of the significant increase in the demand of regional food, they are given the chance to boost the profits by delivering their products to more potential markets. As a result, the specialties of one or many regions are likely to become famous for their unique traits, which leads to long term developments for manufacturers. Besides, users will have a variety of modern diets to consider, making their meals more diversified and nutritious so that it helps promote health and prevent disease.
On the contrary, having a bias towards certain foods may have negative influences on less exotic food brands, the environment and the users themselves. For traditional nourishment, it is considered as a challenge to survive in the competitive markets where big brands are taken over. Furthermore, when demand for particular foods increases, the price also increases, and people in poorer areas where the food is grown are not able to afford to buy it as a consequence. The trend also harms the environment because of the large amount of carbon dioxide emissions produced by the foods’ transportation. Finally, with long distances transportation, the foods need to be treated with chemicals and preservatives which makes them less healthy to eat.
In conclusion, the trend is a double-edged sword, but the disadvantages that the trend offers are more outweighed than the merits. Apart from calling for a more environment-friendly way of transportation, we should not only respect traditional foods with the aim of a balanced and fair competition but also be aware of chemicals used in imported foods since we, the users, are the beneficiaries in the end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-18 | Anhhhhhh | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | hieu13092006 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | Anhhhhhh | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | Anhhhhhh | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-27 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 84 | view |
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 73
- Some say that because many people are living much longer the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerably To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will be no longer necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 89
- More and more people want to buy clothes cars and other products from well known brands What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, furthermore, if, may, so, apart from, as to, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15555555556 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08652987458 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.4659090583 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.571428571 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237112777539 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712747426836 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04490662656 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1338152717 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332323788553 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.