Some people say that to solve today global problem every nation should have a good relationship with other nation to what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?
Global menaces are on the elevation in this jet age of 21st century. Presently, some proportion of masses assertthat international threats like employment, poverty, global warming and terrorism can be curbed on account of having the harmonious bonding with other nations. Here, I would like to accord with the given statement firmly.
A bunch of points can be mentioned to endorse my point of view. First and foremost, terrorism become a worldwide problem and some countries try their level best to overcome from this problem Whereas other countries give influence to terrorism because of political corrupt agenda and feeling of a revenge. Therefore, unity endeavours of countries are required restrain this worrying concern which is mere possible with having good relations with other nations. Moreover, global warming is spreading their roots in every nook and corner of the world due to deforestation and it is not a piece of cake for single country to curtail this problem. Consequently, collaborated efforts are needed to solve this concern which is possible if the nations have better relations with each others.
To commence with, establishment of world organisation is lucrative way where members from different nations are come and discuss the problems along with their appropriate solutions to plunge the global menaces like unemployment and poverty etc. It is apparently seen that, conducting meetings at international level is possible when the Nations have harmonious relation with each other which helps them to mitigate the world level threats.
To recapitulate, it is well said that "two head's are better than one". Therefore I still believe that the role of having better relations with other countries is terrific which enable the distinct countries to put the joint efforts to curtain the worldwide problems at large extent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-11 | jasu | 78 | view |
| 2018-03-21 | Gavi Singh | 83 | view |
- Failure is the proof that desire was not strong enough To what extend do you agree with this statement give reasons for your answer 73
- Some companies are closing their offices one day per week to save energy gas electricity What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 74
- Nowadays congestion and traffic jams are a common and major problem to most cities some people believe it is a good idea to construct wider roads to resolve this issue do you agree or disagree with this statement What can be solution in your opinion 75
- Failure is the proof that desire was not strong enough To what extend do you agree with this statement give reasons for your answer 67
- The Chat below show the percentage of a different type of household waste that is cycle in one City between 1992 and 2002 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utions to plunge the global menaces like unemployment and poverty etc. It is appa...
^^
Line 6, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it is well said that 'two heads are better than one'. Therefore I still...
^^
Line 6, column 82, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s;two heads are better than one'. Therefore I still believe that the role of having...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40206185567 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79857192476 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570446735395 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7463586189 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282456373859 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989830201604 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601402397093 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16750447702 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408552640588 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.