An effective health care system should encourage people to take preventative measures against illness and disease, rather than encourage them to rely on treatment. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
These days, the development of hazardous illnesses is a growing concern among the community. It is argued that whether a good health care system should encourage people to delay the onset of disease by taking preventative measures or rely on medical intervention. In my view, the government should focus on prevention rather than cure.
Firstly, many regimes spend an enormous amount of money to treat people who are suffering from various types of serious illnesses. This extravagance can be easily diminished by spending money on health education. For example, if the administration preaches that smoking and drinking are bad things for the human body through this healthcare educational program, many people will not be attacked by the severe sickness. It is no doubt that this practical measure can bring colossal economic benefits to the government.
Secondly, many governments are making considerable efforts to fight against several types of malady, such as diabetes and heart diseases. Before these health problems assault the people, they can be ceased by taking some effective preventative measures. For instance, doing exercise or sports on a regular basis can reduce the risk of getting these serious illnesses. The construction of parks, playgrounds, and gyms can influence and encourage more people to do exercise, which can prevent them from catching life-threatening diseases. This positive result can be achieved by investing money in preventative measures from the government's health budget.
In conclusion, it goes without saying that this idea is indispensable not only to people but also to the authority. Therefore, the government should prioritize preventative measures over medical treatment.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-10-17 | Thuc Linh Dinh | 73 | view |
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people to do this and give your own opinion 78
- Nowadays many people have access to computers on a wide basis and a large number of children playing computer games What are the negative impacts of playing computer games and what can be done to minimize the bad effects 84
- Celebrities like singers movie stars or influencers nowadays earn too much Do you think they deserve what they earn Explain your answer with relevant examples and or explanation 96
- Some people are convinced that games online are a waste of time while others believe that games online can actually bring benefits about lots of benefits To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...money in preventative measures from the governments health budget. In conclusion, it goes ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57251908397 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01208644682 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629770992366 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.503843801 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.285714286 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304484712932 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960544666477 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837171821686 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183283055467 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928666813119 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...money in preventative measures from the governments health budget. In conclusion, it goes ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57251908397 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01208644682 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629770992366 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.503843801 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.285714286 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304484712932 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960544666477 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837171821686 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183283055467 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928666813119 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.