Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
One of the debatable issues these days is the criteria for the recruiters to select the employees for their positions in companies. Some employers highly appreciate the importance of formal academic degrees over life experience or personal essences when they look for personnel. The primary reason for this trend is due to the novel requirements of organizations, along with it comes the worthwhile developments for themselves.
To integrate into the era of academic-based society, a plethora of companies tend to require employees who have formal scholastic qualifications other than the ones having life experience or their qualities. In particular, the employers may prefer the people trained professionally and can perform advanced skills and knowledge that they embrace in tertiary institutions. As a result, they can deal with a great amount of complicated and essential work such as signing contracts, exchanging with collaborators. Whilst the people's acquisition in life only gives them feasible ways to solve the problems in limited fields, which is meant that they are unable to meet the demands of the recruiters for the stands.
The extreme benefit of employing the intellectual workforce owning Bachelor's degree or Master's degree is as a way to develop the expertise of the staff in corporations, they will contribute their gray matter, ingenuity to create the strategies or the plans, which is conducive to the improvement of the firms. To cite an example, a massive majority of businesses have gained a plethora of profits and became prosperous thanks to the novel manner to recruit the scholar with academic qualifications, namely Google- one of the most thriving corporations in the world, it has selected a large team of economic experts to offer ideas for the projects and feasible solutions to boost the situation of itself.
In conclusion, today more firms have a preference for prominent employees with academic degrees such as Ph. D. or Bachelor's degrees rather than people with real experience or qualities. It is considered that the companies should have refreshments in the method of employing staff to flourish the specialization of the personnel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-09 | linhdung01 | 50 | view |
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include 78
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
- the pie chart below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make relevant comparisions 78
- some people think that some children do not have the natural ability to study other languages so schools should not force them to study foreign languages Agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...changing with collaborators. Whilst the peoples acquisition in life only gives them fea...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, while, as for, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36734693878 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12709907912 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562682215743 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.3004493931 49.4020404114 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.416666667 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5833333333 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2791946302 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101568013642 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981461406354 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169842655639 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979178513409 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.46 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.