Film stars and celebrities often share their views on public matters that have little to do with their profession. Is this a positive or negative development?
Film stars and celebrities often share their views on public matters that have little to do with their profession. Is this a positive or negative development?
Public figures such as movie stars and celebrities voice their thoughts regarding social issues which may not be related to their occupations. This essay will address the advantages of these well-known people's opinions for the public and government.
Having public figures voicing their opinions relating to public matters is beneficial as their thoughts may influence how people perceive social issues around them. Cinta Laura, a well-known actress in Indonesia, for instance, had expressed her opinions about the significance of helping poor children to acquire proper formal education. This influenced many of her loyal fans, and now they have established a foundation called Cinta Untuk Indonesia. This foundation contributes to solving plenty of education issues around the country such as providing scholarships for underprivileged children to obtain university degrees and developing various schools in many places in Indonesia. This is real evidence of how famous people influence others to take part in solving difficulties faced by communities.
Another reason why the opinion of public figures is important is that many of them are well-educated and have broad insight regarding social problems. A famous and intellectual actress of Indonesia, Maudy Ayunda, often gives her suggestion about social issues in formal or informal meetings with the government or non-government organizations. Her ideal to solve the issues are often taken by the government as a consideration in dealing with the crisis in societies. This shows that these famous individuals are also capable to make positive contributions in solving public matters dealt with by the country.
To sum up, although some public figures express their opinion about problems unrelated to their profession, their voices may bring positive changes in the community such as attracting many people to contribute to solving social matters and giving the government recommendation to deal with the difficulties.
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- Some people say History is one of the most important subjects in school Other people think that in today s world subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History Discuss both these views and give your opinion 87
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne 56
- Some commentators feel that grandparents should live together with their children and grandchildren while others say that elderly people should be encouraged to live independently Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate and reach your 56
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe that money should be spend on improving existing public transport Discuss both the 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 690, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...us schools in many places in Indonesia. This is real proof of how famous people’s op...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, so, well, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6711409396 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99434928689 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536912751678 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2613624009 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.833333333 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245824077185 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940778746213 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757203856915 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168996022315 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333948226096 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.