Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like them very much. Why do people take part in dangerous sports? Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers.
There are some sports which are, in our mindset, far riskier than the others; thus, we assume, without a doubt, that there is no one to be interested in such a sport. Nonetheless, not all of us remain the same viewpoint. Many people reckon those sports have never been as dangerous as we have presumed. Conversely, they fall in love with the so-called, from their point of view, most interesting and exciting sports of all time on account of some rationale that I am going to discuss in this essay, together with some precautions which we can implement to alleviate the danger as well as improving their quality.
First and foremost, getting involved in risky sports results in the excitement of our minds. It is due partly to the pleasure associated with fear of possible problems which are prone to happen at any time. In addition, the increasing heartbeat rate and the increasing energy due to the release of glucose or the endorphin count rapidly rises - which contributes to the excitement of our mind even though we are extremely scared. This somehow helps us reduce stress and anxiety. Furthermore, playing extreme sports also involves conquering challenges, fears, and phobias. When we take part in such sports, we will be able to face our greatest fear. Subsequently, when we successfully overcome our nightmare, it will no longer have any influence on us in the long run.
Despite those merits, we cannot confidently assume that it is safe enough to join such dangerous sports. For this reason, organizations in general, and individuals in particular must be well-prepared for the upcoming sports that they will hold or participate in. Regarding organizations, it would be their loss if they did not implement some suggestion to enhance their protective equipment. By so doing, getting involved in extreme sports somehow gets less dangerous than it used to be. As a consequence, players assuredly would feel more secure and comfortable while experiencing those risky sports. As for governments, with an aim of ensuring the utter safe-keeping for every single player, it is wise of them to fabricate more playgrounds with much more modern equipment. Consequently, participants will be more likely to be attracted and become addicted to such sports, without worrying that their lives are being threatened. Lastly, concerning every single player, it would be their loss not to invest the time and effort to get to know more about the necessary skills - which are required to start participating in any dangerous sport. Moreover, they must rigorously pay attention to the guide's instructions - which is an integral part before starting in preparation for the worst situations.
Indeed, with those aforementioned explanations, it is believed that getting involved in dangerous sports is not a foolish decision, but players are trying to experience the excitement that only extreme sports can bring them. What is more, to reduce partly the amount of danger, governments and every single player must deem some of those suggestions that I have mentioned above. I believe that this might bring us a brighter future for extreme sports in particular, and every sport in general.
- The graph below compares in the birth rate of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 78
- Nowadays families are not as close as in the past and a lot of people have become used to this Why is this happening Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the drawbacks 78
- Topic What are the influences of the Internet on youth development 73
- The Chalk Man Book response
- What are the effects of social media on business 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, thus, well, while, as for, in addition, in general, in particular, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 58.0 24.0651302605 241% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2663.0 1615.20841683 165% => OK
No of words: 519.0 315.596192385 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13102119461 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.20363070211 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89452444311 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 176.041082164 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531791907514 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 819.9 506.74238477 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4896529139 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.782608696 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5652173913 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.60869565217 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267502981715 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756061274611 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650596068204 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181159910345 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779340310111 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.