The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts depict local government expenditures on social infrastructure in 2010 and 2015.
Overall, the government invested most in four sections: education, healthcare, pensions, and defense, in comparison with the others: welfare, interest on borrowing, transport, culture, and leisure, and other facilities between 2010 and 2015. While there were larger areas such as social assistance and interest on loans, there were smaller areas such as education, health care and defence. However, pension expenditures remained at 19 per cent throughout the period.
In more detail, the pie chart of government expenditures showed that the largest portion was education and health care, with 24% and 21% respectively in 2010. The Pensions and Defence Sections accounted for a total of 36%, at 19% and 17%. The small others included welfare, interest on loans, transportation, culture and recreation, and the remainder made up only about a third in total.
Furthermore, there were no changes in the distribution of expenses in 2015. There were slight declines in sections of education, healthcare, and defense that consisted of respectively 21, 20, and 14 percent. Spending on welfare and interest on borrowing increased modestly by 5 percent in each one, respectively 13 and 10 percent. The others took over about 3 percent.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-26 hien3112 78 view
2024-10-26 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-10-26 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-10-25 hien3112 67 view
2024-10-20 hahoaan 84 view
Essays by user Lunar Tran :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, so, third, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46341463415 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0398659916 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.0153572012 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.818181818 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149530052732 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593370629255 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906654033042 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123277221029 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103913508046 0.0819641961636 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.