More and more people are relying on their private cars as a major means of transportation. Describe some of the problems over reliance on cars can cause and suggest at least one possible solution.
A few decades ago, cars constituted a luxury item for the wealth however, in these days, private transport have become the predominant mean of transportation. In this essay, I will elaborate on adverse repercussions and propose plausible measures.
To start with, it is sufficiently apparent that the upsurging numbers of individual-owned means of conveyance will cause a variety of negative implications. Firstly, the most discernible problems is increasing likelihood of traffic jams. To illustrate, in the same avenue, if there are only dozens of cars, the traffic system can operate smoothly, nonetheless if that number is multiplied by three or four time, gridlock is virtually inevitable. This issue also follows by such corollary as prolonged travelling time. For instances, in Hanoi, if people commute in rush hour, when traffic jam is par for the course, it will probably take them greater amount of time to reach the final destination. The second issues of precipitous rise in home-possessed vehicles relevant to global warming. Nowadays, the source of energy for engine operation is fossil fuel and oil, which can emit tons of carbon dioxide, the main culprits behind the rise in average temperature, via burning process. It is estimated that a single passenger vehicle release 4. 6 metric tons of gases, consequently, the cumulative amount of gases from millions of van worldwide will be extremely colossal.
However, there are numerous ways that each individual and government can contribute to alleviating the problems. Concerning the first mentioned issue, it can be tackled by encouraging inhabitants to substitute private cars for public counterparts through establishing special lane for busses. Moreover, using electric vehicles is an appropriate movement to address the second problems as they can perform as greatly as the conventional oil-based one with neutral carbon footprint.
In conclusion, the increasing numbers of private cars will result in unwarranted effect, which can be resolved by possible solutions with the joining hand of government and citizens,
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-07 | nijam | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-21 | hi12345454 | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-30 | leanguyen | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-26 | Sayansh Garg | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-14 | Louisa_Nguyễn | 78 | view |
- The table gives information about department and online stores in Australia in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below illustrates weekly consumption by age group of dairy products in a European country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos etc There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The bar chart below shows the average duration of housework women did unemployed part time employed and full time when compared to men who had full time work in the UK between 1985 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fea 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52647975078 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11873638343 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654205607477 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.849246554 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.266666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145983699123 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402630086763 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454112643895 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101663436364 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362488543225 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.