Nowadays because of digital technology it is possible for not only studios but also individuals to produce their own films.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In the era of digitalization, technology has allowed the production of films to professionals as well as to ordinary people. Although this might increase subordinate quality films, overall, this is a positive transition because it creates employment opportunites and distinguished genres of movies.
To begin with, when individuals create motion pictures, they get to earn money. Since no special degress is required, simply by using the internet to learn video editing skills enables even high school drop-outs to make a livelihood. Besides this, they earn name and fame and become well-known people. For instance, many youtubers are known by a large number of population for their work and contents.
Secondly, young enthusiasts video-makers create movies based on unique subjects and try to present fresh perspectives in society. Many people like their array of works, ranging from environmental issues to disparate socioeconomic backgrounds and comedies to crimes. The greater the diverse culture of film stories, the more the gratification people accrue from watching them.
However, some people argue that this engenders to excess poor contents. Since normal people are non-professionals and novice, they do not master the skills of videography. Lacking the suffice acumen of producing quality films, many films are inferior or have illogical story line, resulting in an increase of mediocre films.
To conclude, despite the fact that general people during their fledgling stages of producting films may not create immpecable or blockbuster movies, this is not negative development because film-making with the help of modern technology have opened doors to employment opportunites and the production of some phenomenal works that has received great appreciation and lauds
- Nowadays a lot of offices employ open space designs instead of separate rooms for work Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people say that individuals who make a lot of money are the most successful Others think that those who contribute to society like scientists and teachers are more successful Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 62
- Film stars and celebrities often share their views on public matters that have little to do with their profession Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Some people think that being creative in their free time is beneficial Discuss pros and cons with your opinion 84
- Supermarkets should only sell food produced from within their own country rather than imports from overseas What are your opinions on this 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...r instance, many youtubers are known by a large number of population for their work and contents....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 181, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ster the skills of videography. Lacking the suffice acumen of producing quality films, many...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, as to, for instance, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67537313433 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03274207679 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660447761194 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.1937143288 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185141964033 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053916922192 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434882758628 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957182125237 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452566172531 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.