The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table provides information about how many phones were sold by five brands from the year 2006 to 2012.
There are two clear trends visible, Nokia as a top brand rule the field for most of the time, except in the year 2012 where Samsung surpassed Nokia sale. Nokia starting from a high number 345 million then increased steadily to 463 million phones in 2010. After that, this figure saw a significant dip to 335 million in 2012. Having the same pattern, Samsung soared up gradually from 117 million to 330 million in 2011 where it excessed Nokia and end up at 396.5 million. Likewise, Apple experienced a sharp grow from 2.3 million to 135.8 million, even when it was not a brand until 2007.
Conversely, Motorola, a strong rival of Nokia in 2006, had a bad performance throughout the years. It began with a robust number 210 million and slipped noticeably to only 28 million in 2012. Similarly, Ericsson sale went up modestly from 74 million to 102 million then fall dramatically to 28 million by the end of the period.
Overall, Nokia and Samsung were the two prominent brands that increased sale over the years, meanwhile Ericsson and Motorola were performing badly. In addition, it is noticeable that Apple, a mobile brand that started one year later than the others, had a robust climb.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-15 | nguyenthanhhoa1904 | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | view | |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | view |
- Some people believe that competitive sports both team and individual have no place in the school curriculum To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The flow chart shows trampling the negative effect of tourists walking in the countryside for the environment Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 65
- The pie chart shows the number of people who were using different languages online The table shows the average number of people online each year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows the projected costing over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year as the projects are set 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, likewise, similarly, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77876106195 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43851480459 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610619469027 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2995279739 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.1818181818 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186204369309 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746860166499 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485640708181 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116491966356 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04860297557 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.