Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is this a positive or negative development ?
Industrialization has shaped our recent world. Although it brings a lot of benefits to humanity, its reliance on fossil fuel as a primary supplement takes a toll on the environment. Thus, some countries have begun using renewable energy. While this measure is not entirely ideal, I believe this phenomenon is a positive development.
On the one hand, the advantages of green energy are still called into question. Firstly, it is prohibitively expensive to install the infrastructures to exploit these new energy sources, which means it can be out of reach for some remote areas. Secondly, the use of renewable energy is not the ultimate remedy to perennial environmental issues. For example, solar panels can seriously damage nature when disposed of, let alone the carbon footprint they left through the manufacturing process. Hence, the appropriate use of fossil fuels is still the most feasible solution to tackle the environmental problems.
On the other hand, I believe that the benefits of sustainable energy sources surpass their drawbacks. First, renewable energies like wind, solar, hydro powers are more eco-friendly as they release little or almost no emissions into nature. Since these greenhouse gases are the blame for global warming, cutting on these gases can slow down the warming process. Second, most of the alternative energies are ubiquitous and can be replenished. They are our natural factors such as sunlight and wind, so they never exhaust and can be easier to be extracted as they do not need exploiting from the somewhere deep ocean floor like oil.
In conclusion, while some aspects of renewable powers are left to be desired, I think that their pros outweigh their cons.
- Some people say that we do not need printed newspaper any more To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 73
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary To what extent you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 42
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21167883212 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88346113676 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627737226277 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7632390325 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227081854267 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737549203459 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561120768545 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116246009302 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557751056179 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.