Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations. Others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss these views and give your own opinion.
Funded support, nowadays, is a major topic of concern in society. While there is a common belief that developing countries need practical aid and advice from international organizations, there is compelling evidence that financial help is actually needed.
Non-financial support from international communities, for example, practical aid or advice is believed to play an important role in the developing world. This is because this form of help can show these countries their weaknesses and strengths in order to coordinate a wise scenario in development. For instance, the sustainable building of development necessitates a strong labor force and the acquisition of technology, neither of which can be provided solely by financial help. For example, experts share their experience of farming at the Asean high-level conference in 2021.
However, there are reasonable grounds that the support of international organizations is thought to be of paramount importance to the development of less-developed parts of the world. First of all, people who advocate financial help for developing countries may deuce that this form of support is crucial for building infrastructure. The more money is paid for construction, the more amenities will be offered, for example, skyscrapers, fast lanes, or airports. Moreover, these facilities will attract many businesses investing in these areas and turn them into promising areas in the future. Therefore, It may offer more job opportunities for citizens, and unemployment in developing countries will be curbed.
In conclusion,non-financial help is essential in a few aspects, the reasons why international funding is crucial are more persuasive. I predict that funded support will be at the core of international support in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-19 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-25 | vidung | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-19 | daoduong3204 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-09 | Pham Phuong Trinh | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | minhminhvu7 | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , non-financial
...untries will be curbed. In conclusion,non-financial help is essential in a few aspects, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66044776119 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48764447103 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548507462687 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8826159885 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.692307692 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227246422292 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840588404452 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879492521327 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154625201494 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711159742818 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.