Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person.
With the speedy development of technology nowadays, it is easier for the teenagers to get access to the modern tools. Hence, virtual life, rather than face-to-face communication, is undoubtedly becoming more and more popular. While the apparent reasons for this trend are being investigated into, some tough measures could be taken into consideration to promote real-life talking.
To begin with, teenagers claim a variety of reasons for their preference to the socialising online. The most prominent reason for this may lie in the convenience this commodity offers to young people. Thanks to the increase in the living standard, there is hardly any teenager without a cellphone equiped with such social applications as facebook or instagram. These networks enables people to connect the others regardless of distance. They also can show off every sweet moment, as well as depresing seconds, so that they can receive compliments , be given a sympathetic ear, from anyone else. Then, it cannot be denied that through virtual world, the young may find themselves easier to express their emotion or voice their opinions straightly , which they dare not to do in the real life. Finally, young people nowadays seem to be so busy with their tight work schedule or an overload with assignments that they have little free time to spend with their friends or family members.
However, while this trend, to some extent, brings about some advantages for teenagers, it minimises the real interaction among people. There are some measures that can help tackle the issue. At the first place, human being themselves should strive for a balance between work and play so that some spare time can be spent to have fun with their friends and family.Then, the adults should give the young chances to confide in. By doing that, teenagers can have a real shoulder to cry on whenever they are in troubles. Last but not least, more outdoors activites should be organized to involve the youngsters in.
To recaptulate, although the young have their own reasons to be stick to socialising online, we still can do some things to attract them to the real communication in life.
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 84
- The pie charts below show the units of electricity production by fuel source in Australian and France in 1980 and 2000 73
- The charts below show the percentage of time younger and older people spend on various Internet activities in their free time excluding email Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media do you agree that it is the main reason for a growth in the rate of juvenile crime What solutions can be offer to deal with this situation 56
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
With the speedy development of technolog...
^^^
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o the modern tools. Hence, virtual life, rather than face-to-face communication, ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...deration to promote real-life talking. To begin with, teenagers claim a variety...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... young people. Thanks to the increase in the living standard, there is hardly any...
^^
Line 2, column 388, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'enable'.
Suggestion: enable
...s facebook or instagram. These networks enables people to connect the others regardless...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 558, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ds, so that they can receive compliments , be given a sympathetic ear, from anyone...
^^
Line 2, column 757, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...otion or voice their opinions straightly , which they dare not to do in the real l...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with their friends or family members. However, while this trend, to some exten...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
... have fun with their friends and family.Then, the adults should give the young chanc...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rganized to involve the youngsters in. To recaptulate, although the young have ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, still, then, well, while, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07627118644 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66935380829 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59604519774 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7921525331 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.3125 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0465645585878 0.244688304435 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0219298799234 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371466425322 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0292098886841 0.151304729494 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155728980368 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.