Do you agree or disagree with the statement that government should invest money in science education rather than other subjects to develop country?
In our modern society, establishing an appropriate national educational framework is of paramount importance to the development of any country. A school of thought believes that science subjects should be a priority with more essential investment than other disciplines. I strongly disagree with this belief, because many subjects are equally as important as science, or even more so.
On the one hand, language education plays no lesser role in the development of nations than science does. While science subjects are the backbone of the economy which contributor to these ideals and knowledge to manufacture nearly a whole of the existent merchandise, language subjects are a useful tool for expanding mutual understanding as well as international co-operation. Furthermore, taking Singapore as a typical example where devoting an excessive amount of time and effort to generalizing English as a compulsory subject in public schools is one of the most industrially developed counties.
On the other hand, history is also a more important subject than several technology subjects, which may instil a sense of patriotism in students, and as a result, they can be more willing to contribute to their hometown shortly. A host of third-world countries witnessed a vast of well-known scientists who choose to migrate and settle in developed countries for better living and working conditions. This brain-drain phenomenon can be limited if history has more attention from the educational departments of these countries.
Finally, it is irrefutable that science subjects are major contributors to the development of the economy in almost all countries. Thanks to these subjects, each country can reach a balance between the standard of living and ideal working hours for ordinary citizens, such as Scandinavia countries. Nonetheless, this is not a plausible reason to only concentrate on promoting science subjects without caring about others, which are empowered to the ubiquity of disregarding subjects considered not important as science subjects among students in this day and age.
In conclusion, the merits of other subjects should not be underestimated, and therefore the governments should play a vital role in making a balanced framework for students with reasonable distributions of every subject.
- Research has shown that the transportation of products and people are the main source of pollution Some people believe the government is responsible for while others believe it is the fault of individuals Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 78
- Some people say that art painting music poetry can be made by everyone whereas others believe that it can be only made by those with special abilities Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
... this belief, because many subjects are equally as important as science, or even more so. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...important as science, or even more so. On the one hand, language education play...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... most industrially developed counties. On the other hand, history is also a mor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tional departments of these countries. Finally, it is irrefutable that science ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts among students in this day and age. In conclusion, the merits of other subje...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, third, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55681818182 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19699606391 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.1223304606 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.461538462 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0769230769 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8461538462 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295794175524 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104825158127 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662395297082 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167533015983 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520963594479 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.