Fossil fuels such as coal, oil and natural gas are the main energy source
for many countries. However, some nations are using alternative energy
such as solar power, or wind power. To what extent do you think this is a
positive or negative development?
The consensus view is that energy is a foundation stone of every emerging economy. While fossil fuels are the primary sources of energy in many countries, several nations are utilizing alternative energy sources. From my point of view, I suppose that shifting towards using alternative energy is a worthwhile investment.
It is true that fossil fuels are used to generate the majority of the world's energy which exert adverse effects on both environment and human health. To begin with, nonrenewable energy such as oil and coal are overexploited as a result of ever - increasing industrialization, which may lead to the degradation of the environment. Massive strip-mining operations, for example, release a great amount of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere causing air pollution. Furthermore, due to the tremendous amount of emission from petroleum - powered vehicles, several metropolises around the world such as Shanghai, Beijing, and London have suffered from hazardous air quality that poses a threat to the citizens’ health problems, especially respiratory disorders.
I believe that attaching significance to alternative energy is advantageous. Firstly, power from wind or sun is more sustainable than coal and oil. Instead of the reliance on finite resources, harnessing solar, wind or hydro-electric power which is renewable results in a long - term development. In fact, many first - class nations such as Japan pursue their purpose of a green economy by launching several policies namely Japan Renewable Energy Policy Platform. Secondly, the power from renewable resources is radically eco- friendly. According to the International Renewable Energy Agency, currently 220 million to 330 million tons of annual carbon dioxide are saved due to solar photovoltaics. Moreover, thanks to using alternatives, we can halt the imminent energy crisis, specifically the global depletion of natural resources.
In conclusion, I believe that investing in renewable energy sources rather than relying on fossil fuels may help us reap numerous health and environmental benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | cat silver 602 | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-01 | bui12345 | 84 | view |
- In many countries people like to eat a wider variety of food than can be grown in their local area As a result much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantage 84
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are the main energy source for many countries However some nations are using alternative energy such as solar power or wind power To what extent do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...re used to generate the majority of the worlds energy which exert adverse effects on b...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6858974359 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17499544225 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1250699168 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.266666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4666666667 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322633717506 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101762583623 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053430632131 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181113212008 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547267558448 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.