International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.
Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words
There is no denying that international tourism has a significant influence on both local residents and the environment surrounding. In spite of strong arguments about its detrimental effects, I partly believe that its advantage could outweigh its disadvantage.
By all accounts, there are many evident reasons why it is argued that international tourism would lead to various harmful impacts on the environment and local people. When it comes to travelling, it is likely to cause an increasing amount of rubbish consumed by thousands of visitors, which makes the local authorities have difficulty processing them. If the landfills are out of control to keep them, rubbish will be directly thrown into the environment; which seems to be damaging towards wild species. Furthermore, more traditional values tend to disappear because of the development of international tourism. The young living next to tourism spots intend to be more familiar with modern and fashionable stuff which are brought by travellers. It means that the local people would quickly find their customs less interesting or suitable any more so that the tradition would be forgotten.
However, I find various positive effects that international tourism would be beneficial for local inhabitants and the environment. There is no doubt that more career opportunities relating to tourism such as service could be created. The young who no longer go to the big cities in order to find a job with a decent salary have chances to stay and build their hometown, thanks to the growth of international tourism. Besides, It is more preferable for the local government to approve financial investments which stem from government and private organizations for potential places located nearby tourism destinations. As a result, the environment including not only nature but also man-made ones could find more potential to be improved.
In conclusion, although many people would debate that international tourism creates many disadvantages, I personally think that it is right to some extent but its advantages could bring more for local citizens and the environment.
- In many countries household waste eg Food packing is increasing day by day What are the reasons How can this problem be solved 67
- The best way to solve the world s traffic and environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion 84
- Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem 84
- Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference in income earnings between the rich and poor To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fr 59
- A government s role is only to provide defence capability and urban infrastructure roads water supplies etc All other services education health social security should be provided by private groups or individuals in the community Discuss both these views a 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41265060241 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.082411567 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575301204819 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8281755503 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.357142857 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297807986145 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10837002157 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787499631827 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200366172998 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337641040823 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.