The graph below the number of tourists visiting a particular Carribean island between 2010 and 2017

Essay topics:

The graph below the number of tourists visiting a particular Carribean island between 2010 and 2017.

The graph illustrates the number of tourists, from 2010 to 2017, who visited a definite Caribbean island. The graph dictates the total number of visitors in those years and also shows the number of visitors who either stayed on cruise ships or the island. According to the chart, though the total number of tourists is inclined gradually, visitors choice on staying cruise ships or island fluctuated.
Visitors who wanted to stay on cruise ships were more in number than those on the island. In 2010, about 750000 travelers stayed on cruise ships and the number of this grew from 2011 to 2013 and remained the same for the next years though fluctuate only at 2016.
The number of visitors staying on the island was increased significantly all the years without 2012. The difference in the number of visitors staying on the island between 2017 and 2010 was about 1.5 million and in 2017, 5000 thousands more people stayed on the island than on cruise ships.
The total number line always stayed inclining though visitors choice about staying varied with time.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-22 hahoaan 73 view
2024-08-14 Zahid6400 61 view
2024-04-14 soomi2209 61 view
2024-03-11 MinyiChu 67 view
2024-02-04 Saul 67 view
Essays by user Tanvir_Ahmed :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e stayed on island than cruise ships. The total number line, always stayed inclin...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97701149425 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28617193388 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3254930357 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274202128353 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15143383277 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994063924588 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172797709693 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105882560523 0.0819641961636 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.