The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015
The bar chart illustrates the number of different types of wastage collected by a recycling centre over the course of 5 years starting in 2011.
As can be seen from the chart, all four recorded categories of waste experienced an upward trend albeit with their periods of volatility.
Moreover, the figures for paper were the highest among the years surveyed except for the year 2013.
In particular, there were 58 tons of paper waste, compared to almost 50 tons of glass and approximately 33 tons and 32 tons of tins and garden garbage respectively in 2011. The next year saw a decrease in all sectors with the highest figure for paper at 50 tons and the lowest for garden at roughly 15%.
However, while the number of wastage in the form of paper continued to fall by 10 tons in 2013, that of three other types rose back to their 2011’s level. Interestingly, the figures for paper went through a two stage increase in the next 2 years, first slightly over 50 tons then exponentially to 70 tons. Meanwhile, that for glass, tins, and garden fluctuated marginally around the 2013’s level, ending up at over 50 tons, nearly 40 tons and 35 tons sequentially in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 67 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view |
- The bar chart shows mobile usage in a country by age group from 1998 to 2000 84
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today
- In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work Some people regard this as completely wrong while others consider it as valuable work experience important for learning and taking responsibility What are your opinions on this 73
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, then, while, except for, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71359223301 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60426374438 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597087378641 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.8227948485 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.375 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121255457136 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060626279332 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846512615566 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881172020315 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961365804334 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.