All large companies should provide sport and social facilities to local community.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that the local residents must be given sport and social amenities by all huge organizations. From my perspective, I partly disagree with this statement that the responsibility of constructing facilities is not solely for companies.
The argument in favor of forcing the businesses to supply the prerequisite for citizens is that they must be contributed things to their living areas due to their high income. As an illustration, those equipment are beneficial for inhabitants also the employees who work in large companies not only their health but also their mind may feel relaxing, the productivity, therefore may leed to a significant increase. To some extent, sport and social provision can bring a positive effect to the community.
However, I believe that it is difficult if only big offices try to meet the need of the local community about giving potential. The first reason is that the enormous number of occupations for the local community is created by the organizations, so that if those companies are forced to build things free of charge for the community, they may relocate to somewhere else. As a result, unemployment will definitely become a serious problem in this place. The second reason is that most of the companies come up with the development of the countries as they participate in or even hold charities to reduce the poverty annually. The head of the companies may feel overwhelmed if they have to be responsible for improving their living areas by layout the means of social and sport.
In conclusion, I believe that sport and social facilities can have advantages as enchanting the strength and even the mind to people. However, the enforcement of building those things to large companies may have bad impacts on society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-09-07 | Tuan Harry | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | tranvuongphuongmy | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world Today however growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem What are the causes of the increased demand and what measure could governments and individuals take to respond 56
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun or even as a useful educational tool Others however believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them In your opinion do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits 61
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed However others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments Can experimentation on animals be justified Are there any alternatives 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this equipment' or 'those equipments'?
Suggestion: this equipment; those equipments
... their high income. As an illustration, those equipment are beneficial for inhabitants also the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05802047782 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98615894086 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542662116041 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3423694979 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20252727386 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745473812529 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048202109311 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12871432866 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328345819508 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.