the graph below shows fast food consumption among men and women in 2015. summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparissons where relevant.
The bar graph shows the proportion of daily calories by fast food divided into four diffferent age groups and two genders in 2015
Overall, men were more likely to consume the calories than women, while people aged just over 65 years ware the lowest.
The percentage of people aged 18-34 years made up the highest rate with males eating the calories presented 1% higher than that of females. However, people aged 35-49 years consumed calories from junk food showed the second rank, and the figure for female was 1% lower than male ones.
Bracket aged over 65 years illustrated the lowest eating daily calories. This group accounted for just below 6% of men while around 3% of women ones were seen. Nevertheless, the age group of 50-64 years was higher than the oldest, and made up around 4% bigger than those, representing approximately 9% of men, and this was not far different from the percentage of women for consuming calories.
- The chart shows how tourism to two countries changed over a 50 year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 41
- the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different mode of transport 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of school leavers from three schools in the same town who went on to higher or further education Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 54
- people who buy three kinds of music based on gender and age 73
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measure can government and individuals take to tackle the issue 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erent age groups and two genders in 2015 Overall, men were more likely to consume...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 781.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88125 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33317614798 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60625 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4818905748 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.166666667 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106838393904 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569698276819 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531444530318 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794810834687 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476494718327 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.