The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided chart compares the proportion of companies joining the social media between three types of businesses during a 4-year span commencing from 2012.
From a cursory glance, it is evident that it is in 2016 when the proportion of corporations with social media coverage was the highest. During the studied period, small businesses ranked bottommost in this field while large businesses was the leader of this feature.
A closer insight into the chart reveals that in 2012, the percentage of companies with social media presence of large businesses was nearly 80%, while that of medium businesses was 31%, with 3% higher than small businesses'. During the first three years, the figure for social media involved small corporations rose considerably to 35%, whereas that of medium companies experienced an enormous increase in 2013 and an uptick in 2014 to nearly 50%. In contrast, the percentage of large businesses involving in social media remained the same in the first two years, followed by a moderate drop the following year.
A quite different picture can be seen in 2015 when all three types of businesses took a nosedive in the proportion of companies with social media coverage. Finally, in 2016, the percentage of small businesses joining social media went up to 49%, similarly, that of medium corporations increased sharply to 52%. In terms of large companies, the figure escalated to 79%, with 1% higher than the initial.
- The graph below shows the usage of oil in four different countries between 1966 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nation Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wherever relevant write at least 150 words 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the changes of a village in 1995 and now 78
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...when all three types of businesses took a nosedive in the proportion of companies with soc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17021276596 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71062827748 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497872340426 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8658243439 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205947609444 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972211126969 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567495675019 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142513145646 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225390962762 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.