The Graph Below Shows The Number Of Visitors To Three Museums Between 2000 And 2005. Summarize The Information By Selecting And Reporting The Main Features, And Make Comparisons Where Relevant.
The comparison in millions of visitors annually in three different museums from 2000 to 2005 is displayed in the bar chart.
Overall, Edo-Tokyo was the most well-known museum, but its popularity was surpassed by National museum in China. Furthermore, all figures experienced an upward trend year-to-year, except that for Edo museum.
Initially, Edo museum in Tokyo was the most popular place, showing the highest annual number in almost 14 million, while MET one in New York was lower number, with a gap of about 2 million. When it comes to National one in China, its number of attendees accounted for the smallest, a half of the counterpart situated in the USA.
Eventually, the vast majority of Chinese attending National museum increased dramatically to more than twofolds, at 16 million, being the maximum data recorded. Although American attending MET museum inclined to slightly over 14 million, it had hit the lowest point by 2003 at around 8 million. Turning to the Japan’s Edo museum, the figure for this located in Tokyo witnessed a decrease of tourists to 10 million tourists.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Dua5 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | Sadullayev Nodirbek | 82 | view |
| 2022-03-08 | lethaianh | 87 | view |
| 2022-03-06 | lethaianh | 55 | view |
- Information technology is changing many aspect of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Children are suggested to study from Televisions However some people agree that other sources can be the best media for them to learn Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries 61
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11731843575 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80667188538 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664804469274 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2325058524 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131715411118 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645716237013 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662886255368 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103893015675 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757038852256 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.