The bar charts show education data related to young adults aged 15 years in 10 different countries in 2015. The first chart shows in which countries adolescents do the most homework in terms of hours per week.The second chart shows the nations that scored the best in international science test. Summarise the data by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wherever necessary .
The first chart illustrates the number of hours spent by 15 year old adolescent on homework in various countries in 2015. The second bar chart highlights the top countries with scores recorded in science measured against international standard by the same age group in the same year.
Overall, it appears to have a correlation between countries where children spent little time doing their homework and higher science score.
Among the top countries which spent time on doing homework, Finland spent the least time by 2.8 hours while South Korea and Japanese students averaged 2.9 and 4.3 hours respectively. The average time in rest of the countries fall between five to seven hours, while Italy spent the longest time (8.6 hours) doing assignments, over four times longer than Finland.
With respect to science score, teenagers in Finland scored the highest with mean score of 568, despite spending the least amount of time doing their homework. Aside from Hong kong-china which recorded 543, adolescents in the next six nations averaged to 530 points. The lowest score was recorded by Netherland and USA with 518 and 516 points. Interestingly, Italy did not qualified to be within the top ten countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-13 | vanditaverma.v@gmail.com | 83 | view |
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of this mobility outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries 73
- The chart illustrates the consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 84
- The diagram shows the the life cycle of flowering plants 61
- The table below shows the figures in thousand for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... age group in the same year. Overall, it appears to have a correlation between...
^^
Line 8, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ries which spent time on doing homework, Finland spent the least time by 2.8 hour...
^^
Line 8, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntries fall between five to seven hours, while Italy spent the longest time 8.6 h...
^^
Line 8, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ongest time 8.6 hours doing assignments, over four times longer than Finland. ...
^^
Line 10, column 31, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nland. With respect to science score, teenagers in Finland scored the highest ...
^^
Line 10, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ored the highest with mean score of 568, despite spending the least amount of tim...
^^
Line 10, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st amount of time doing their homework. Aside from Hong kong-china which recorde...
^^
Line 10, column 379, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'qualify'
Suggestion: qualify
...6 points. Interestingly, Italy did not qualified to be within the top ten countries. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2538071066 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5489816252 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609137055838 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0007913817 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238816158119 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105800584059 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930985953807 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155715382963 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10779886861 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.