The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.
The comparison in the estimation of illiteracy in five different regions by genders for 2000 is displayed in the bar chart, shown in percentage.
Overall, South Asian were the most suffering from illiteracy compared to other areas, and them in advanced world showed a reverse, while others varied. Furthermore, women were more vulnerable than men to experience this issue.
As per data, top three regions having the largest illiteracy population were South Asia, Arab States, and Sub-Saharan Africa, with the rate of females in about a half, and that of males at approximately three in ten. This contrasts to the aforementioned region, the vast majority of persons in developed nations did not suffer from this reading problem, showing the proportion of both sexes at below a twentieth.
Turning to the population of Oceania or East Asia, women being unable to read were a fifth, being more than those living in Latin America or Caribbean at only a half of the previous place. When it comes to the counterpart gender, those in the latter region estimated to possess this problem accounted for one in ten, which was lower than those in the former at around one in twenty.
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part time 78
- The bar chart compares the recycling rates of four different kinds of waste material in a city from 1992 to 2002 89
- The average prices per kilometre of clothing imported into the European Union from six different countries in 1993 and 2003 are shown in the bar chart below Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where 89
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016 84
- The pie charts below show the data regarding the time people spend on smartphones and tablets divided by category 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68385384336 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644670050761 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.2829492224 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.714285714 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197689041638 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885115911642 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893889758782 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13070548056 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914305146495 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.