The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts provide the information about the change of different 5 categories of sources of energy produced by France over the course of ten years, namely coal, gas, petro, nuclear and other, starting in 1995.
Overall, it is immediately obvious that an upward trend was experienced in coal, gas, nuclear and others except for petro, gone into a free-fall. Additionally, coal remained the most popular over the surveyed years.
Specifically, coal was accounted for 29.80 percent in 1995. Then, this figure was increased until reaching a peak of 30.93 percent in 2005, ensued by gas, which was accelerated from 29.63 percent to a level of 30.31 percent in 2005. Not only coal and gas can be seen, but other and nuclear was also registered the same trend to approximately 9.10 percent and 10.10 percent, respectively.
Strikingly, petro, occupied 29.27 percent in 1995, was gone into a free-fall. From then on, petro was declined considerably. As a result, only 19.55 percent of the total energy consumed belonged to petro in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-05 | khangoccho | 50 | view |
- Nowadays the environment is being threatened significantly What are the causes and consequences of this problem Give solutions for this problem 80
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant v 78
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 84
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and handheld games, starting in 2000. Overall, it is immediately obvious that ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... most popular over the surveyed years. Specifically, handheld games occupied 11...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lion of dollars, but starting in 2002. Strikingly, console games accounted for ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 54, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '6 billion'.
Suggestion: 6 billion
...gly, console games accounted for almost 6 billions of dollars firstly. It reached a downturn,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 214, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '3 billion'.
Suggestion: 3 billion
...like the first 3 years to approximately 3 billions of dollars in 2006.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24855491329 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7159142691 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630057803468 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2117776336 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20338422568 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925882532808 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448864026262 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114719952123 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407991898308 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.