Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the growth of technology in an earlier era had numerous advantages more than technological inventions. In my opinion, I totally disagree with this view.
On the one hand, there are various benefits from modern technology which enhance the standard of citizen's living. Initially, digital devices connected with the internet facilitates interactions with friends, family members, and relatively by video call, texting, or emails, instead of using outdated telephone just calling. Besides, accessing the knowledge related to new subjects or fields becomes easier than ever for students at the click of a button on computers or smartphones. Compared to those earlier devices which limit saving the information, state-of-the-art gadgets can keep and conserve huge data. For example, myths, poetry, oratory, or historical stories in the past will not be disappeared and be passed down to offspring in the future. Furthermore, the cost of new tools is reasonably priced, consequently, users can afford it.
On the other hand, modern technological machines are more eco-friendly. The reason is that scientists' endeavors try to do subtle modifications and up-gradations making the products more environmentally by reducing emissions. For instance, using new filter systems in industry or factory minimize the number of toxic exhaust in the atmosphere, so residents can avoid respiratory diseases such as lung cancer.
In conclusion, I believe that the evolution of technology has a positive impact on the environment and society nowadays. Nevertheless, it is undeniable that outdated gadgets are a fundamental background for the success of devices in the coming times.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-05 | vishal sachdeva | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-07 | VietAn97 | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-20 | Khanhu010101 | 89 | view |
| 2020-11-10 | lhm.ils | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 67
- The table shows the percentage of students giving a good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010
- The table shows the percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62352941176 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19469475642 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670588235294 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4503338649 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.307692308 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2307692308 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164719616887 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572142671261 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733493078476 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109728270652 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747938208171 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.