The table below shows the changes in some household types in Canada from 1984 to 2020.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The percentages in some household types in Canada between 1984 and 2020 is illustrated in the table.
Overall, Canadian have a tendency to live with their spouse with their dependent children, while single becomes the lowest number.
Initially, Canadian couple with dependent children becomes the majority at 52% in 1984. Although it was gradually decreased, but it is still in the top at 36% in the end of period, while lone parent showed the reverse, it was the minority at 4% in 1984, even it was constantly increased, however it is still the lowest position at twelve percent in 2020.
For, Canadian who prefer to live alone, it was the minority but not the least in 1984 accounted for 6%. However, it was gradually increase until reach its peak at 12% in 2014 and it is still in the same percentage in the end of period. Compared to couple with non-dependent children, it was increased once in 2004 at 11% and hit the lowest position at 9 from 2014 until the end of period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-11 | Ahmad Gelora Mahardika | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-13 | dhananjaydeej | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | Elenochka315 | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | Elenochka315 | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-26 | _phdiep | 90 | view |
- In many countries around the world life expectancy is increasing Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this situation and give your own opinion 78
- Fewer students are studying science at school and university favouring more computer based subjects instead Is this a positive or negative development What are the reasons for this 82
- The Oxford AstraZeneca Vaccine has probably saved more live than other 56
- Government should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organization Do you think it is positive or negative development 73
- The tables below show people s reasons for giving up smoking and when they intend to give up Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...unted for 6%. However, it was gradually increase until reach its peak at 12% in 2014 and...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68965517241 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56571704409 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0123893001 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.089343887002 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585972677624 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087857631762 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088733791996 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10646719514 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.