The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph illustrated the number of enquiries sent to the Tourist Information Office in a particular city between January to June in 2010.

It was clear that visitors in a city made the most inquiries in person, while two other choices were writing letters, emails and using telephone became less common. Overall, the number of inquiries in person had the most dramatic change among the two alternatives.

In January, the Tourist Information Office had the most amount of inquiries from using the telephone, about 900 calls, while writing emails and letters became the least common choice, just about 700 asks. Not many tourists chose to ask for information in person. For over two months, in March. Tourist Information Office had more enquiries by asking people, increased from just over 400 to 600 enquiries. From January to February, using the telephone had a slight fall, but in March, the telephone upflited to 1000 inquiries. Writing letters and emails nearly reached a plateau during this period.

From April to June, all three choices had different changes. Asking person showed an upward trend by shooting up almost 2000 enquiries. There was a flat at just below 600 inquiries in the number of tourists writing letters and emails for information in April, which was followed by a decrease to nearly 400 asks in June. Besides the development of making inquiries in person, via telephone also had a jump to 1600 enquiries in June, after going down and stabilizing in the previous period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-26 minhnhat2002 73 view
2023-07-12 Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn 67 view
2023-04-09 vuhungbo 89 view
2023-04-09 vuhungbo 89 view
2023-04-09 vuhungbo 89 view
Essays by user Anh1405 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.052 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55261748016 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.0479296508 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1538461538 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53846153846 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187071865871 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731253490331 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683270721733 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132254806371 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745358566751 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.