The graph shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK.
The given graph illustrates the proportion of the British using modern technology in homes over the course of 8 years starting from 1996.
As can be seen from the graph, it is clear that the percentage of users in all newest devices witnessed an upward trend. It is also apparent that the figure for CD players was by far the highest while the least was the Internet access over the full period.
In 1996, there was almost 60% of people used CD players. This number went up significantly and reached the peak of about 80% after 8 years. A roughly similar trend was seen in the number of home computers, where it grew from approximately 30% to 58% throughout the period.
The allocation of people using cell phones was nearly 20% at the beginning of the period. This figure fluctuated between its original number and 70% for the rest of the time frame. In 1998/99, Internet access appeared in the UK and accounted for only 10%, then followed by a sharp increase by more than 30% to almost 50% in 2002/03
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-10 | Nguyên-MTTN | view | |
| 2023-08-22 | Vinty | 79 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | Phan Quang Tuan | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | ducmap03 | 11 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
- The graph shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK 84
- The pie charts below show the types of media used from 1990 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 85
- The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 78
- The plans show changes to the layout of a theatre between 2010 and 2012 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y more than 30% to almost 50% in 2002/03
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57142857143 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43085765791 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631868131868 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8932850589 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4444444444 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123679573847 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443901036012 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553814756263 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822135105816 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586451822593 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.