The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The average carbon dioxide (CO2) emission per capita measured in metric tonnes between 1967 and 2007 in four European countries is depicted in the graph.
Overall, UK made up the highest CO2 emissions, although such trend showed a decline, following by Sweden’s figure. However, the CO2 emission raised gradually in two remaining countries.
In 1967, UK accounted for CO2 emissions over 10 metric tonnes while the figure for Portugal showed the lowest CO2 emissions at below 2. After 40 years, UK successfully decreased such emissions to slight over 8, making a narrow gap with Italy emissions by around 1. However, Sweden and Portugal had same emission level at under 6 in 2007.
Standing at over 8, CO2 emitted in Sweden had experienced an increase at over 10 in 1977, followed by Italy and Portugal at around 6 and 2 respectively. While Sweden decreased CO2 emissions the figure for the other countries continued the upward trends. However, UK emissions constantly decreased over the period.
- Some people believe that tax on junk food should be risen What is the purpose of this notion What is the negative impact of this notion 73
- Some people believe arts are important in people s lives Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that tax on junk food should be risen What is the purpose of this notion What is the negative impact of this notion 82
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries in three different years over a twenty year period
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries in three different years over a twenty year period
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1717791411 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72322159677 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576687116564 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6147380963 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36029180556 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14954644021 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986706311091 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233252032479 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103207086002 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.