The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens
I personally believe that the nation shines by its people. A country or the country’s leader is defined by its own people. It is for the people the leader emerges and not vice versa. So yes, the effectiveness of the country’s leader lies with the welfare of the people.
Right from the dawn of history, the duty of the government has been two folds: To provide effective administration aiming the welfare of its own kind, Attacking the other military and defending against external troops leading to the wellness of its people. The ultimate destination of both the ways are welfare of the people. But when a nation dares to deviate from the basic checkpoint of making people happy it is definitely marking its own descend
A nation trying to be powerful in military when it has a bottom level hunger index can never make its leader, an admirable one. A leader publishing success stories of reaching trillion economy while 85% of its people cannot afford the basic medicinal needs can never make history. I would like to mention the Former Egyptian president Mr. Hosni Mubarak. He vowed to make Egypt stronger by brewing his military and grooming his external political strategies. Meanwhile an unprecedented unemployment and poverty shook its people. This led to the rise of the August revolt and unveiled the lacking of the Egyptian leader. On the contrary, the names Fidel castro and Raul castro echoed frequently in the entire year of 2020. Their names stood as being the leaders of the only nation winning the COVID -19 while the entire world crumbled. Their name broadcasted as the leaders who provided medical excellence to all its citizens. Their names shone as the leaders who built a magnificent self reliant country with least poverty level. This distinguishes the leader remembered by his deeds to his people.
While discussing about need of the leader’s focus on its people, there arises a very important question: Which people are we talking about? The welfare of which people should the leader focus? Is it the top 5 % elites who posses three quarters of the nation’s wealth or the remaining commoners who fights through every day struggles of life. A leader under whose imperial the tribal people from the forest are evacuated for the construction of Tea factory is definitely inclined for the wellness of the factory owner but is it the wellness that the leader should portray? A leader’s quality is directly proportional to the well being of the one last citizen without any social or economical powers. His actions are indeed to be reflected by making the world a better place for that anonymous commoner.
A leader whose heart flutters for the suffering of all human being begins to glow. A leader who seeks others welfare more than his begins to rise. A leader who wants to create a nation for all begins to lead for a leader is what his people are.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-16 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Winner | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | PS5 | 75 | view |
| 2023-02-08 | abhikhanna | 66 | view |
| 2023-01-02 | abhikhanna | 62 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 wor 56
- The table below gives information about past and projected population figures in various countries for different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively 83
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 459, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...ming his external political strategies. Meanwhile an unprecedented unemployment and pover...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 926, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...medical excellence to all its citizens. Their names shone as the leaders who built a ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1004, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
...uilt a magnificent self reliant country with least poverty level. This distinguishes the l...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 148, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s welfare more than his begins to rise. A leader who wants to create a nation for...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, while, talking about, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2398.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 491.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88391038697 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57815248758 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517311608961 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 14.0 4.99550561798 280% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.3682550512 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2307692308 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8846153846 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.15384615385 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227340536134 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069097302312 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770932754416 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138441526034 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769890594307 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.