The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors – agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services – to the UK economy in the twentieth century.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart illustrates the total contribution of the three areas, namely agriculture, manufacturing, and business and finance over the course of a century.
Overall, the contribution of agriculture and manufacturing decreased over time, whereas the opposite is true for the field of business and finance services.
Agriculture contributed around 48% at the beginning of the 20th century, then went up minimally 50 years later. After that time, it witnessed a dramatic downfall to about 10% and 2% in 1975 and 2000, being the lowest figure among the three sectors. The same pattern is conspicuous for the manufacturing area, at 45% in 1900. In the middle of the century, it went down slightly to about under 40%, and then gradually dropped by 5% in 1975. The figure kept decreasing by two times in 2000.
In contrast, there was an augmentation in business and finance although it commenced at a very low point - 3% in 1990. After that the proportion reached 10% in 1950, and doubled in 1975, and eventually became the sector with the greatest contribution in 2000, with around 35%.
- The charts below show the percentage of electricity consumed by different sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows the number of cars produced in three countries from 2003 to 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, then, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01098901099 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92000710926 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598901098901 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.817199416 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114780325248 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447117875303 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036383245757 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0779938491252 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270287994624 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.