does increase in human popalation affects birds?
Recently, there has been a debate. More specifically, In regard to the passage, the author puts forth the idea of factors affecting bird population. He feels this way for three specific reason. In the listening passage, the lecturer is quick to point that there are serious flaws made in author's claims. In fact, the professor believes bird population is not affected by increasing human population and addresses the trouble made in each point of the reading text.
Firstly, the author in the article states that as population of humans expands the natural habitat of birds will disappear. He also highlights, the size of bird population will decrease when their traditional area decreases.
In contrast, the lecture claims that the population increases when there is urban growth. He also gives examples of birds and strengthens his point by saying that some birds population has increased and the growth is clearly visible.
Secondly, the author asserts that agricultural practices increases to keep up with growing population of humans. However, the lecturer calls this argument into question by saying that agricultural lands are not expanded in any way. Further he remarks that technological development helps crops to produce more yield using minimum land.
Finally, the author concludes by saying that chemical pesticides used for agriculture harms birds indirectly. He also points out that pesticides indirectly affects the food chain of birds. However, the lecturer brings this argument into question by saying that more of the farmlands use less poisonous pesticides rather than traditional ones. In the listening passage, the professor states the genetically modified crops allow them to have high yields even without pesticides. which don't even harm birds and more resistant to pests
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-05 | deepak krishnamurthy | 85 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage about Text Speak 80
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graph shows the percentage of males and females academic staff members across the faculties of a major university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavant 61
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... In the listening passage, the lecturer is quick to point that there are seriou...
^^
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...passage, the lecturer is quick to point that there are serious flaws made in aut...
^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...rengthens his point by saying that some birds population has increased and the growth...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...ve high yields even without pesticides. which dont even harm birds and more resistant...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 483, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...h yields even without pesticides. which dont even harm birds and more resistant to p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, in contrast, in fact, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40569395018 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72200355014 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569395017794 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8004693124 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3529411765 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5294117647 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205656404945 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654405332604 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713945436204 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121300170282 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060305643765 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.