The table below shows information about age, average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting and make comparisons where relevant
The given table chart illustrates data about age, yearly income, and population below the poverty line in three different states in the United States in 2000.
Overall, it is clear that people under 18 years accounted for the largest proportion in Utah but people 65 years old were lowest in the three states. In addition, the average income per person and the percentage of poor people in California were the largest.
People under 18 years made up 32,20% of the Utah population compared to 27,20 % and 22,70% of people living in California and Florida, respectively. In contrast, there was only 17,6% of citizens who are 65 years old lived in Florida, while the figures for people inhabiting California contributed just 10.6% and Utah accounted for 8.5%.
Turning to average income per capita, the highest proportion of annual income was at $22,711 of California, followed by Florida and Utah, at $21,557 and $18,185, respectively. Meanwhile, California was the state where the proportion of the poor population was highest with 14.2%, while Utah and Florida states were lower percentages of needy people, 9.4% and 12.5%, respectively.
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA Summarise the information by selecting and reporting and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- In some countries around the world men and women are having babies late in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Some people think the government should not spend money on supporting artists and money should be spent on more important things To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Utah population compared to 27,20 % and 22,70% of people living in California an...
^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...trast, there was only 17,6% of citizens who are 65 years old lived in Florida, while th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20652173913 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68433760378 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3037460562 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.857142857 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160345100819 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900965970048 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095020372107 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122571861286 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106793150321 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.