Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
I do not agree with who says that a forced climb in the price of petrol would be the solution to traffic and pollution problems. I think other actions would be more effective than this one.
To begin with, the correlation between the price of petrol and traffic and pollution is less clear than it seems. People use cars mainly to go to their workplace, and for this reason they do it even if fuel costs increase. In my country, for example, the state has recently put heavy taxes on fuels, but the use of cars has not changed. Furthermore, there is an incredible amount of plastic in the world. Since plastic has a ridiculous price, it is highly unlikely that an increase in the price of petrol would bring a decline in its production.
Another problem related to this proposal is: how far is possible to control and adjust the price of petrol? If I had to answer this question, from my knowledge and experience, I would say that is simply impossible. In fact, petrol is traded on financial markets, and the forces of demand and supply decide its price. A state could, with the help of its central bank, manipulate the price, but only for a brief period; this because a continuous press of money would create a huge inflation, that is well known to be a serious problem.
Therefore, I believe that there are more intelligent solutions to the problems in question. One way to diminish traffic could be encouraging people to use public transport instead of cars. To do this the state should create parking spaces near stations, and increase the price of parking in big cities. On the other hand, the problem of plastic has the same importance. Wastes create pollution. The only possible solution to this is recycling. People should be educated that if we do not recycle wastes, pollution will continue to threaten our health.
To conclude, I do not believe that increasing the price of petrol would solve our problems. Traffic and pollution could be reduced with education and incentives to make people using less their cars and recycling.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 89 | view |
2019-11-17 | julieehung | 67 | view |
2019-10-15 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
2019-10-13 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
2019-08-30 | ghikar | 78 | view |
- Today in this modern contemporary world people are striving hard to earn their living and to have two square meals a day In this so called high profiled technological growth people are suffering from many problems and diseases As the growth is proliferati 90
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 80
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 72
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 40
I do not agree with who says that
I do not agree with those who state that
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 357 350
No. of Characters: 1636 1500
No. of Different Words: 176 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.347 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.583 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.428 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 116 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 51 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.85 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.418 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.55 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.308 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.506 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.053 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5