Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Government should invest on new railways rather than build new roads. I strongly agree.
To begin with, Railways have less impact on environment and occupy less area than roads. Railway can transport many people and commodities simultaneously and it uses less energy per passenger compared to road. Railways usually are part of public assets and are managed by government. In this regard, some environmental policies or new technologies which improve energy efficiency can be easily implemented. On the other side, roads are often used by people who seek their own benefits and do not pay that much attention to environmental issues. They would choose a means of transportation that charges them less disregarding how much it is good for environment.
Secondly, Railway has higher rate of safety than road. Trains move on specific railway and all of them are monitored by experts which means that the probability of crashing two trains is almost zero. On the other side, crashing two cars is inevitable and the large number of people die on roads every day.
Lastly, people can easily do their daily routines when they are in the train. It is undoubtedly a very important feature. For instance, reading books, sleeping, playing games and doing your job remotely are all advantages that make people choose traveling by train. They can also walk along the corridors and prevent to get backache.
In conclusion, train has many advantages which outweigh road’s benefits. Governments should encourage people to use railway mode by virtue of invest money on its infrastructures and decrease the price of its tickets. Government also would be benefited from that. If Government puts railways first in its priorities, it does not need to spend much money to mitigate environmental issues or accommodate medical care for people who are injured in car accidents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-03 | Behnaz.babayani | 78 | view |
- telecommuting refers to workers doing their jobs from home for part of each week and communicating with their office using computer technology telecommuting is growing in many countries and is expencted to be common for most office workers in the coming d 73
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workspace Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake regardless of whether the course 56
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are usually
...er passenger compared to road. Railways usually are part of public assets and are managed b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to travel'.
Suggestion: to travel
... all advantages that make people choose traveling by train. They can also walk along the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, lastly, regarding, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18272425249 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82858711502 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591362126246 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.743650113 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1052631579 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8421052632 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218887239403 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618471854747 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579120446052 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123713890746 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563769608191 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.