The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years.
The charts illustrate the figure of devices used by Canadians in the 18 to 25 age bracket to watch television between 2009 and 2019.
A glance at the graphs reveals that while the proportion of mobile phones, flat-screen TV and tablet used followed an upward trend, the opposite was true for the others. Also, it is apparent that the use of flat-screen TV surpassed that of conventional TV to become the highest.
Looking at the pie charts in more detail, we can see that the percentage of conventional TV used by Canadian for viewing purposes was the highest in 2009, at 34%, almost double that of laptop and desktop computers, at 19% or thereabouts each. Over the next 10 years, the use of conventional TV plummeted to a mere 4%. Meanwhile, the figure for that of laptop and desktop computers witnessed a marginal decrease to about one-tenth in 2019.
Turning to the remaining categories, in 2009, while 15% of people chose mobile phones to watch television in Canada, flat-screen TV, and tablet constituted nearly the same percentages, at approximately 6% each. 10 years later, the figure for mobile phones was almost twofold that in 2009, at roughly one quarter. In the meantime, the statics for flat-screen TV and tablet underwent a considerable rise to 27% and 19%, consecutively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-12 | jenny_nguyen | 82 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | rachell | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-18 | Han Duyen | 55 | view |
| 2021-12-16 | mrinal | 79 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | Amna Zeeshan | 78 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph below shows the number of international conferences in three cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The maps below show the changes that took place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 61
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'bracket' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'brackets'.
Suggestion: brackets
...s used by Canadians in the 18 to 25 age bracket to watch television between 2009 and 20...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94495412844 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91103389541 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54128440367 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5601051632 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.777777778 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157030316653 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723118976137 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989489994621 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129593717281 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120853795508 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'bracket' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'brackets'.
Suggestion: brackets
...s used by Canadians in the 18 to 25 age bracket to watch television between 2009 and 20...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94495412844 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91103389541 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54128440367 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5601051632 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.777777778 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157030316653 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723118976137 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989489994621 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129593717281 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120853795508 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.