The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals, of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
The Pie chart give nutritional information of three potential unhealthy ingredients for different meal. Overall, dinner accounted for the salt and then lunch accounted for the both salt and saturated fat, while snack accounted for the highly added sugar.
Here, all ingredient are used more often in every meal time some little bit are different. As the mentioned in the pic charts, 43% of salt are eaten in the dinner, whereas 37% saturated fat are eaten in the dinner and 23% of sugar added in the snack item. Which is really more noticeable, significantly highly risk at elements of food are eaten at night, before sleep. In the other hand, we can see the chart for the lunch items. In the noon meal time, salt are consumed 29% which is high than the other elements, saturated fat are consumed 26%, parallel19% of sugar added in the lunch.
In this point view, the chart given more information serially like breakfast and dinner food ingredient. Mostly, added sugar in the snacks meal time, the percentage is 42, moreover used sodium and saturated fat at snacks are 14% and 21%. Culminating with the last meat time was breakfast, where all elements are used same ratio, no increased or decreased the percentage at all and that is 16%.
Hence, all food elements are unhealthy, however, unhealthy foods are eaten increased significantly.
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 56
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 56
- Writing Task 1 Diagram Instant noodles manufacturing process 79
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- With the improvements in today s health care society has to care for more and more elderly people Do you feel that society will be able to cope with the increase in numbers of elderly people today and how can it be managed Give reasons for your answer and 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...used more often in every meal time some little bit are different. As the mentioned in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lements, saturated fat are consumed 26%, parallel19% of sugar added in the lunch....
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...llel19% of sugar added in the lunch. In this point view, the chart given more i...
^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'snacks'' or 'snack's'?
Suggestion: snacks'; snack's
... ingredient. Mostly, added sugar in the snacks meal time, the percentage is 42, moreov...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: NOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...where all elements are used same ratio, no increased or decreased the percentage a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, really, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93832599119 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56632034564 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533039647577 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7958363094 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.909090909 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15479732908 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661671458021 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397504320491 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989019274699 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169014770606 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.